Standard

A framework to assess integration in flood risk management : Implications for governance, policy, and practice. / Cumiskey, Lydia; Priest, Sally J.; Klijn, Frans; Juntti, Meri.

In: Ecology and Society, Vol. 24, No. 4, 17, 2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Cumiskey, Lydia ; Priest, Sally J. ; Klijn, Frans ; Juntti, Meri. / A framework to assess integration in flood risk management : Implications for governance, policy, and practice. In: Ecology and Society. 2019 ; Vol. 24, No. 4.

BibTeX

@article{61103da374124570894deaa4f67f8075,
title = "A framework to assess integration in flood risk management: Implications for governance, policy, and practice",
abstract = "Over decades the concept of integration has been promoted to enhance alignment between policy domains, and to manage trade-offs and maximize synergies across management practices. Integrated approaches have the potential to enable better outcomes for flood risk management (FRM) and society as a whole. However, achieving integration in practice is a recurring challenge, especially for FRM where multiple actors need to work together across fragmented policy domains. To disentangle this complexity of integration, a framework is proposed for assessing integration and identifying different degrees of integration. This framework is based on evidence from a literature review, 50 interviews with FRM-related professionals in England, and participant observation at 24 meetings relevant for FRM. The framework sets out the context of integration, assesses the governance capacity for integration through the strength of relationships between different types of actors (bridging, bonding, and linking) and the mechanisms (actor-, rule-and resource-based) that influence them, and the realization of integration in practice through knowledge, policies, and interventions. The framework is applied for FRM in England and used to identify degrees of integration: high, intermediate, low, and minimal. An important characteristic of the framework is the interconnectivity between the governance capacity and realization of integration. The framework provides further theoretical insights into the concept of integration, while offering an approach for researchers, policy makers, and practitioners to recognize current degrees of integration in FRM and identify the critical elements for improvement. It is recommended that further research and practice-based applications of the framework are completed in different geographical and institutional contexts. Specifically, such applications can create further understanding of the interactions and dependencies between elements of the governance capacity and realization of integration.",
keywords = "Assessment framework, Governance, Integrated flood risk management, Integration, Policy",
author = "Lydia Cumiskey and Priest, {Sally J.} and Frans Klijn and Meri Juntti",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.5751/ES-11298-240417",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
journal = "Ecology and Society: a journal of integrative science for resilience and sustainability",
issn = "1708-3087",
publisher = "The Resilience Alliance",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A framework to assess integration in flood risk management

T2 - Implications for governance, policy, and practice

AU - Cumiskey, Lydia

AU - Priest, Sally J.

AU - Klijn, Frans

AU - Juntti, Meri

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Over decades the concept of integration has been promoted to enhance alignment between policy domains, and to manage trade-offs and maximize synergies across management practices. Integrated approaches have the potential to enable better outcomes for flood risk management (FRM) and society as a whole. However, achieving integration in practice is a recurring challenge, especially for FRM where multiple actors need to work together across fragmented policy domains. To disentangle this complexity of integration, a framework is proposed for assessing integration and identifying different degrees of integration. This framework is based on evidence from a literature review, 50 interviews with FRM-related professionals in England, and participant observation at 24 meetings relevant for FRM. The framework sets out the context of integration, assesses the governance capacity for integration through the strength of relationships between different types of actors (bridging, bonding, and linking) and the mechanisms (actor-, rule-and resource-based) that influence them, and the realization of integration in practice through knowledge, policies, and interventions. The framework is applied for FRM in England and used to identify degrees of integration: high, intermediate, low, and minimal. An important characteristic of the framework is the interconnectivity between the governance capacity and realization of integration. The framework provides further theoretical insights into the concept of integration, while offering an approach for researchers, policy makers, and practitioners to recognize current degrees of integration in FRM and identify the critical elements for improvement. It is recommended that further research and practice-based applications of the framework are completed in different geographical and institutional contexts. Specifically, such applications can create further understanding of the interactions and dependencies between elements of the governance capacity and realization of integration.

AB - Over decades the concept of integration has been promoted to enhance alignment between policy domains, and to manage trade-offs and maximize synergies across management practices. Integrated approaches have the potential to enable better outcomes for flood risk management (FRM) and society as a whole. However, achieving integration in practice is a recurring challenge, especially for FRM where multiple actors need to work together across fragmented policy domains. To disentangle this complexity of integration, a framework is proposed for assessing integration and identifying different degrees of integration. This framework is based on evidence from a literature review, 50 interviews with FRM-related professionals in England, and participant observation at 24 meetings relevant for FRM. The framework sets out the context of integration, assesses the governance capacity for integration through the strength of relationships between different types of actors (bridging, bonding, and linking) and the mechanisms (actor-, rule-and resource-based) that influence them, and the realization of integration in practice through knowledge, policies, and interventions. The framework is applied for FRM in England and used to identify degrees of integration: high, intermediate, low, and minimal. An important characteristic of the framework is the interconnectivity between the governance capacity and realization of integration. The framework provides further theoretical insights into the concept of integration, while offering an approach for researchers, policy makers, and practitioners to recognize current degrees of integration in FRM and identify the critical elements for improvement. It is recommended that further research and practice-based applications of the framework are completed in different geographical and institutional contexts. Specifically, such applications can create further understanding of the interactions and dependencies between elements of the governance capacity and realization of integration.

KW - Assessment framework

KW - Governance

KW - Integrated flood risk management

KW - Integration

KW - Policy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85077885448&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5751/ES-11298-240417

DO - 10.5751/ES-11298-240417

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85077885448

VL - 24

JO - Ecology and Society: a journal of integrative science for resilience and sustainability

JF - Ecology and Society: a journal of integrative science for resilience and sustainability

SN - 1708-3087

IS - 4

M1 - 17

ER -

ID: 68944216