Standard

An emotional deliberation approach to risk. / Roeser, S; Pesch, U.

In: Science, Technology & Human Values, Vol. 41, No. 2, 2016, p. 274-297.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Harvard

Roeser, S & Pesch, U 2016, 'An emotional deliberation approach to risk' Science, Technology & Human Values, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 274-297. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243915596231

APA

Vancouver

Author

Roeser, S ; Pesch, U. / An emotional deliberation approach to risk. In: Science, Technology & Human Values. 2016 ; Vol. 41, No. 2. pp. 274-297.

BibTeX

@article{aa42de15d7954f238827e69b85bc2ed5,
title = "An emotional deliberation approach to risk",
abstract = "Emotions are often met with suspicion in political debates about risky technologies, because they are seen as contrary to rational decision making. However, recent emotion research rejects such a dichotomous view of reason and emotion, by seeing emotions as an important source of moral insight. Moral emotions such as compassion and feelings of responsibility and justice can play an important role in judging ethical aspects of technological risks, such as justice, fairness, and autonomy. This article discusses how this idea can be integrated into approaches for political decision making about risk. The article starts with an analysis of the dichotomous view of reason and emotion in risk theory, in approaches to participatory risk assessment as well as in relevant approaches to political philosophy. This article then presents alternative approaches in political philosophy and political theory that do explicitly endorse the importance of emotions. Based on these insights, a procedural approach for policy making is presented, in which emotional responses to technological risks, and the ethical concerns that lie behind them, are taken seriously. This approach allows for morally better political decisions about risky technologies and a better understanding between experts and laypeople.",
author = "S Roeser and U Pesch",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1177/0162243915596231",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "274--297",
journal = "Science, Technology & Human Values",
issn = "0162-2439",
publisher = "SAGE Publishing",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - An emotional deliberation approach to risk

AU - Roeser, S

AU - Pesch, U

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Emotions are often met with suspicion in political debates about risky technologies, because they are seen as contrary to rational decision making. However, recent emotion research rejects such a dichotomous view of reason and emotion, by seeing emotions as an important source of moral insight. Moral emotions such as compassion and feelings of responsibility and justice can play an important role in judging ethical aspects of technological risks, such as justice, fairness, and autonomy. This article discusses how this idea can be integrated into approaches for political decision making about risk. The article starts with an analysis of the dichotomous view of reason and emotion in risk theory, in approaches to participatory risk assessment as well as in relevant approaches to political philosophy. This article then presents alternative approaches in political philosophy and political theory that do explicitly endorse the importance of emotions. Based on these insights, a procedural approach for policy making is presented, in which emotional responses to technological risks, and the ethical concerns that lie behind them, are taken seriously. This approach allows for morally better political decisions about risky technologies and a better understanding between experts and laypeople.

AB - Emotions are often met with suspicion in political debates about risky technologies, because they are seen as contrary to rational decision making. However, recent emotion research rejects such a dichotomous view of reason and emotion, by seeing emotions as an important source of moral insight. Moral emotions such as compassion and feelings of responsibility and justice can play an important role in judging ethical aspects of technological risks, such as justice, fairness, and autonomy. This article discusses how this idea can be integrated into approaches for political decision making about risk. The article starts with an analysis of the dichotomous view of reason and emotion in risk theory, in approaches to participatory risk assessment as well as in relevant approaches to political philosophy. This article then presents alternative approaches in political philosophy and political theory that do explicitly endorse the importance of emotions. Based on these insights, a procedural approach for policy making is presented, in which emotional responses to technological risks, and the ethical concerns that lie behind them, are taken seriously. This approach allows for morally better political decisions about risky technologies and a better understanding between experts and laypeople.

UR - http://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:aa42de15-d795-4f23-8827-e69b85bc2ed5

U2 - 10.1177/0162243915596231

DO - 10.1177/0162243915596231

M3 - Article

VL - 41

SP - 274

EP - 297

JO - Science, Technology & Human Values

T2 - Science, Technology & Human Values

JF - Science, Technology & Human Values

SN - 0162-2439

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 2657624