Abstract
In active learning, one aims to acquire labeled samples that are particularly useful for training a classifier. In sequential active learning, this sample selection is done in a one-at-a-time manner where the choice of sample t + 1 may depend on the current state of the classifier and the t labeled data points already available. In their deviation from standard random sampling, current active learning schemes typically introduce severe sampling bias. Even though this fact has been acknowledged in the more theoretical contributions covering active learning, the more popular approaches largely ignore this bias. This work empirically investigates the consequences of their actions and sets out to identify the pros and cons of this way of dealing with the problem of active learning. Even though current techniques can provide excellent approaches to learning, we conclude that they provide inconsistent solutions and therefore, in a strict sense, do not solve the problem of active learning.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | 2016 23rd International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR) |
Place of Publication | Piscataway, NJ |
Publisher | IEEE |
Pages | 210-215 |
Number of pages | 6 |
ISBN (Electronic) | 978-1-5090-4847-2 |
ISBN (Print) | 978-1-5090-4848-9 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2016 |
Event | ICPR 2016: 23rd International Conference on Pattern Recognition - Cancún, Mexico Duration: 4 Dec 2016 → 8 Dec 2016 Conference number: 23 |
Conference
Conference | ICPR 2016 |
---|---|
Country/Territory | Mexico |
City | Cancún |
Period | 4/12/16 → 8/12/16 |
Keywords
- Training
- Logistics
- Loss measurement
- Standards
- Learning systems
- Convergence
- Pattern recognition