ARCH-COMP18 Category Report: Stochastic Modelling

Alessandro Abate, Henk Blom, Nathalie Cauchi, Sofie Haesaert, Arnd Hartmanns, Kendra Lesser, Meeko Oishi, Vignesh Sivaramakrishnan, Sadegh Soudjani, More Authors

Research output: Chapter in Book/Conference proceedings/Edited volumeConference contributionScientificpeer-review

73 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This report presents the results of a friendly competition for formal verification and policy synthesis of stochastic models. The friendly competition took place as part of the workshop Applied Verification for Continuous and Hybrid Systems (ARCH) in 2018. In this first edition, we present five benchmarks with different levels of complexities and stochastic favours. We make use of six different tools and frameworks (in alphabetical order): Barrier Certificates, FAUST2, FIRM-GDTL, Modest, SDCPN modelling & MC simulation and SReachTools; and attempt to solve instances of the five different benchmark problems. Through these benchmarks, we capture a snapshot on the current state-of the art tools and frameworks within the stochastic modelling domain. We also present the challenges encountered within this domain and highlight future plans which will push forward the development of more tools and methodologies for performing formal verification and optimal policy synthesis of stochastic processes.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationEPiC Series in Computing
Pages71-103
Volume54
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018
EventARCH18: 5th International Workshop on Applied
Verification of Continuous and Hybrid Systems
- Oxford, United Kingdom
Duration: 13 Jul 201813 Jul 2018
Conference number: 5
http://cps-vo.org/group/ARCH

Workshop

WorkshopARCH18: 5th International Workshop on Applied
Verification of Continuous and Hybrid Systems
Abbreviated titleARCH18
Country/TerritoryUnited Kingdom
CityOxford
Period13/07/1813/07/18
Internet address

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'ARCH-COMP18 Category Report: Stochastic Modelling'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this