Standard

At home in the oasis : Middle-class newcomers’ affiliation to their deprived Rotterdam neighbourhood. / Bosch, Eva M.; Ouwehand, André L.

In: Urban Studies, Vol. 56, No. 9, 2019, p. 1818-1834.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

BibTeX

@article{d806593306dd4ed18025c3096caeb07e,
title = "At home in the oasis: Middle-class newcomers{\textquoteright} affiliation to their deprived Rotterdam neighbourhood",
abstract = "One of the arguments for {\textquoteleft}social mix{\textquoteright} urban renewal in low-income neighbourhoods is that the presence of middle-class residents would improve life chances for lower-income groups. However, according to various researchers, middle-class newcomers have little social interaction with the neighbourhood, do not feel at home there and make little use of the neighbourhood{\textquoteright}s public spaces and facilities. In short, they show disaffiliation with their mixed neighbourhoods, thus compromising the assumed positive effects of social mixing. Several studies, on the other hand, point to different factors that mediate this (dis)affiliation, such as newcomers{\textquoteright} lifestyles, housing trajectories, the width of class and ethnic differences between newcomers and the existing population and the presence of neighbourhood shops and facilities that can cater to both groups. This relatively large set of factors suggests a need for detailed case-study research to understand neighbourhood affiliation of middle-class newcomers. We made a qualitative and quantitative study of a housing complex designed specifically for middle-class buyers with a {\textquoteleft}diversity-liking lifestyle{\textquoteright}, in a poor neighbourhood in Rotterdam, the Netherlands. It has not been researched before how using the assumed preferences of diversity-liking middle-class households in dwelling design, for social mix, relates to the eventual residents{\textquoteright} neighbourhood affiliation. The study yields hardly any disaffiliation in the sense of exclusionary spatial strategies: almost all residents use (semi-)public spaces in the neighbourhood on a day-to-day basis. Affiliation in terms of self-identification with the neighbourhood, however, is higher for residents with a diversity-liking lifestyle, and only the minority-ethnic residents use neighbourhood primary schools.",
keywords = "diversity/cohesion/segregation, neighbourhood housing, Rotterdam, social mix",
author = "Bosch, {Eva M.} and Ouwehand, {Andr{\'e} L.}",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1177/0042098018777462",
language = "English",
volume = "56",
pages = "1818--1834",
journal = "Urban Studies: an international journal for research in urban studies",
issn = "0042-0980",
publisher = "SAGE Publishing",
number = "9",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - At home in the oasis

T2 - Middle-class newcomers’ affiliation to their deprived Rotterdam neighbourhood

AU - Bosch, Eva M.

AU - Ouwehand, André L.

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - One of the arguments for ‘social mix’ urban renewal in low-income neighbourhoods is that the presence of middle-class residents would improve life chances for lower-income groups. However, according to various researchers, middle-class newcomers have little social interaction with the neighbourhood, do not feel at home there and make little use of the neighbourhood’s public spaces and facilities. In short, they show disaffiliation with their mixed neighbourhoods, thus compromising the assumed positive effects of social mixing. Several studies, on the other hand, point to different factors that mediate this (dis)affiliation, such as newcomers’ lifestyles, housing trajectories, the width of class and ethnic differences between newcomers and the existing population and the presence of neighbourhood shops and facilities that can cater to both groups. This relatively large set of factors suggests a need for detailed case-study research to understand neighbourhood affiliation of middle-class newcomers. We made a qualitative and quantitative study of a housing complex designed specifically for middle-class buyers with a ‘diversity-liking lifestyle’, in a poor neighbourhood in Rotterdam, the Netherlands. It has not been researched before how using the assumed preferences of diversity-liking middle-class households in dwelling design, for social mix, relates to the eventual residents’ neighbourhood affiliation. The study yields hardly any disaffiliation in the sense of exclusionary spatial strategies: almost all residents use (semi-)public spaces in the neighbourhood on a day-to-day basis. Affiliation in terms of self-identification with the neighbourhood, however, is higher for residents with a diversity-liking lifestyle, and only the minority-ethnic residents use neighbourhood primary schools.

AB - One of the arguments for ‘social mix’ urban renewal in low-income neighbourhoods is that the presence of middle-class residents would improve life chances for lower-income groups. However, according to various researchers, middle-class newcomers have little social interaction with the neighbourhood, do not feel at home there and make little use of the neighbourhood’s public spaces and facilities. In short, they show disaffiliation with their mixed neighbourhoods, thus compromising the assumed positive effects of social mixing. Several studies, on the other hand, point to different factors that mediate this (dis)affiliation, such as newcomers’ lifestyles, housing trajectories, the width of class and ethnic differences between newcomers and the existing population and the presence of neighbourhood shops and facilities that can cater to both groups. This relatively large set of factors suggests a need for detailed case-study research to understand neighbourhood affiliation of middle-class newcomers. We made a qualitative and quantitative study of a housing complex designed specifically for middle-class buyers with a ‘diversity-liking lifestyle’, in a poor neighbourhood in Rotterdam, the Netherlands. It has not been researched before how using the assumed preferences of diversity-liking middle-class households in dwelling design, for social mix, relates to the eventual residents’ neighbourhood affiliation. The study yields hardly any disaffiliation in the sense of exclusionary spatial strategies: almost all residents use (semi-)public spaces in the neighbourhood on a day-to-day basis. Affiliation in terms of self-identification with the neighbourhood, however, is higher for residents with a diversity-liking lifestyle, and only the minority-ethnic residents use neighbourhood primary schools.

KW - diversity/cohesion/segregation

KW - neighbourhood housing

KW - Rotterdam

KW - social mix

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85050273866&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0042098018777462

DO - 10.1177/0042098018777462

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85050273866

VL - 56

SP - 1818

EP - 1834

JO - Urban Studies: an international journal for research in urban studies

JF - Urban Studies: an international journal for research in urban studies

SN - 0042-0980

IS - 9

ER -

ID: 54767916