@inbook{0766f773ffd44de395974b5634c08f72,
title = "Criteria for scientific study and design",
abstract = "Could a design be the product of scientific work to be compared with a scientific report? If so, under which conditions and when? The topic is eagerly discussed both within and outside of faculties of architecture. On the web-site of the Design Research Society (DRS) there is a lively debate on what a design study and a study by design really are and when a designer can also be designated a scientist. These questions stood central during the 1996 EAAE Congress organised by the Delft Faculty of Architecture on the theme {\textquoteleft}Doctorates in Design + Architecture{\textquoteright}.a In order to answer these questions we discuss first the terms {\textquoteleft}research{\textquoteright} and {\textquoteleft}study{\textquoteright} and the usual pre-requisites that must be met for study to be designated {\textquoteleft}scientific{\textquoteright}. Next, similarities and differences between designing and studying are dealt with. Following that, we discuss the usual way in the scientific community of looking at the criteria for a design to be branded as a product of scientific study. For that purpose a summary is given of the requirements the Technical University in Delft associates with a the r{\^o}le it played during the initiative leading to this handbook of design related study. Finally we give a specimen of criteria for evaluation of a scientific architectural design (ex post) and of a proposal for a design related study (ex ante).",
author = "{de Jong}, TM and {van der Voordt}, DJM",
year = "2002",
language = "English",
isbn = "90-407-2332-X",
pages = "19--30",
editor = "{de Jong}, T.M. and {van der Voordt}, D.J.M.",
booktitle = "Ways to study and research urban, architectural and technical design",
publisher = "DUP Science",
}