TY - JOUR
T1 - Detecting anomalies in diaphragm walls with electrical resistance measurements
AU - Spruit, Rodriaan
AU - van Tol, Frits
AU - Broere, Wout
AU - Slob, Evert
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - Quality control of diaphragm walls prior to excavation is often difficult. One technique that can be used to detect anomalies in diaphragm walls involves electrical resistance. Electrical resistance measurements across a diaphragm wall can (within a strict framework) be used to verify the presence of leaks in diaphragm walls as a supplement to crosshole sonic logging. From measurements around a test wall conducted in this study, it is concluded that the detectability of anomalies with electrical resistance decreases exponentially with the increasing distance between the measurement electrodes and the wall. Electrical resistance setups with two and four electrodes have been compared. For usable results, a four-electrode setup must be used in which the potential electrodes need to be placed very close to the wall (less than 0.2 m away). Based upon the test experience, a field setup for verification of a building pit consisting of diaphragm walls is suggested, as well as a setup for determining the quality of the concrete covering the rebar in quay walls constructed with diaphragm walls.
AB - Quality control of diaphragm walls prior to excavation is often difficult. One technique that can be used to detect anomalies in diaphragm walls involves electrical resistance. Electrical resistance measurements across a diaphragm wall can (within a strict framework) be used to verify the presence of leaks in diaphragm walls as a supplement to crosshole sonic logging. From measurements around a test wall conducted in this study, it is concluded that the detectability of anomalies with electrical resistance decreases exponentially with the increasing distance between the measurement electrodes and the wall. Electrical resistance setups with two and four electrodes have been compared. For usable results, a four-electrode setup must be used in which the potential electrodes need to be placed very close to the wall (less than 0.2 m away). Based upon the test experience, a field setup for verification of a building pit consisting of diaphragm walls is suggested, as well as a setup for determining the quality of the concrete covering the rebar in quay walls constructed with diaphragm walls.
U2 - 10.3997/1873-0604.2016022
DO - 10.3997/1873-0604.2016022
M3 - Article
SN - 1569-4445
VL - 14
SP - 481
EP - 491
JO - Near Surface Geophysics
JF - Near Surface Geophysics
IS - 6
ER -