Standard

Formal and informal assessment of energy technologies. / Pesch, Udo; Correlje, Aad; Cuppen, Eefje; Taebi, Behnam; van de Grift, Elisabeth.

Responsible Innovation 3. ed. / lotte asveld; rietje van dam-mieras; tjalling swierstra; saskia lavrijssen; k linse; jeroen van den hoven. Vol. 3 Springer, 2017. p. 131-148.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Conference proceedings/Edited volumeChapterScientificpeer-review

Harvard

Pesch, U, Correlje, A, Cuppen, E, Taebi, B & van de Grift, E 2017, Formal and informal assessment of energy technologies. in L asveld, R van dam-mieras, T swierstra, S lavrijssen, K linse & J van den hoven (eds), Responsible Innovation 3. vol. 3, Springer, pp. 131-148. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64834-7_8

APA

Pesch, U., Correlje, A., Cuppen, E., Taebi, B., & van de Grift, E. (2017). Formal and informal assessment of energy technologies. In L. asveld, R. van dam-mieras, T. swierstra, S. lavrijssen, K. linse, & J. van den hoven (Eds.), Responsible Innovation 3 (Vol. 3, pp. 131-148). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64834-7_8

Vancouver

Pesch U, Correlje A, Cuppen E, Taebi B, van de Grift E. Formal and informal assessment of energy technologies. In asveld L, van dam-mieras R, swierstra T, lavrijssen S, linse K, van den hoven J, editors, Responsible Innovation 3. Vol. 3. Springer. 2017. p. 131-148 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64834-7_8

Author

Pesch, Udo ; Correlje, Aad ; Cuppen, Eefje ; Taebi, Behnam ; van de Grift, Elisabeth. / Formal and informal assessment of energy technologies. Responsible Innovation 3. editor / lotte asveld ; rietje van dam-mieras ; tjalling swierstra ; saskia lavrijssen ; k linse ; jeroen van den hoven. Vol. 3 Springer, 2017. pp. 131-148

BibTeX

@inbook{f7a1f9b9e4ee4d4b9d84cef0ebf88e45,
title = "Formal and informal assessment of energy technologies",
abstract = "Societal controversies on the implementation of new energy technologies relate to public values that are affected by these new technologies. The process of specifying and articulating these values and assessing technologies based on those values follows both a formal and an informal trajectory. This chapter studies the interplay between such formal and informal assessment in the case of two plans for the implementation of energy technologies in the Netherlands, the project to develop carbon capture and storage in the municipality of Barendrecht and the project to have explorative drilling for shale gas in the municipality of Boxtel. What these studies reveal is that values that are specified by actors emerge from different discourses. These discourses do not emerge independently, but develop in mutual interaction, at times contributing to a progressive entrenchment of positions. To avoid such a situation, the symmetry between different claims for the public interest needs to be attended by policy makers.",
author = "Udo Pesch and Aad Correlje and Eefje Cuppen and Behnam Taebi and {van de Grift}, Elisabeth",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-319-64834-7_8",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-3-319-64833-0",
volume = "3",
pages = "131--148",
editor = "lotte asveld and {van dam-mieras}, rietje and tjalling swierstra and saskia lavrijssen and k linse and {van den hoven}, jeroen",
booktitle = "Responsible Innovation 3",
publisher = "Springer",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Formal and informal assessment of energy technologies

AU - Pesch, Udo

AU - Correlje, Aad

AU - Cuppen, Eefje

AU - Taebi, Behnam

AU - van de Grift, Elisabeth

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Societal controversies on the implementation of new energy technologies relate to public values that are affected by these new technologies. The process of specifying and articulating these values and assessing technologies based on those values follows both a formal and an informal trajectory. This chapter studies the interplay between such formal and informal assessment in the case of two plans for the implementation of energy technologies in the Netherlands, the project to develop carbon capture and storage in the municipality of Barendrecht and the project to have explorative drilling for shale gas in the municipality of Boxtel. What these studies reveal is that values that are specified by actors emerge from different discourses. These discourses do not emerge independently, but develop in mutual interaction, at times contributing to a progressive entrenchment of positions. To avoid such a situation, the symmetry between different claims for the public interest needs to be attended by policy makers.

AB - Societal controversies on the implementation of new energy technologies relate to public values that are affected by these new technologies. The process of specifying and articulating these values and assessing technologies based on those values follows both a formal and an informal trajectory. This chapter studies the interplay between such formal and informal assessment in the case of two plans for the implementation of energy technologies in the Netherlands, the project to develop carbon capture and storage in the municipality of Barendrecht and the project to have explorative drilling for shale gas in the municipality of Boxtel. What these studies reveal is that values that are specified by actors emerge from different discourses. These discourses do not emerge independently, but develop in mutual interaction, at times contributing to a progressive entrenchment of positions. To avoid such a situation, the symmetry between different claims for the public interest needs to be attended by policy makers.

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-64834-7_8

DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-64834-7_8

M3 - Chapter

SN - 978-3-319-64833-0

VL - 3

SP - 131

EP - 148

BT - Responsible Innovation 3

A2 - asveld, lotte

A2 - van dam-mieras, rietje

A2 - swierstra, tjalling

A2 - lavrijssen, saskia

A2 - linse, k

A2 - van den hoven, jeroen

PB - Springer

ER -

ID: 45193235