Frequency effects in the dynamic lateral stiffness of monopiles in sand: insight from field tests and 3D FE modelling

E. Kementzetzidis, A. Metrikine, Willem Geert Versteijlen, F. Pisano

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

14 Citations (Scopus)
103 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

With the offshore wind industry rapidly expanding worldwide, geotechnical research is being devoted to foundation optimisation - most intensively for large-diameter monopiles. The analysis and design of monopiles still suffers from significant uncertainties in relation to cyclic/dynamic loading conditions. The aim of this work is to shed new light on dynamic soil-monopile interaction, based on the results of unique full-scale experiments performed at the Westermeerwind wind park (Netherlands). The response of a 24 m long, 5 m diameter monopile to harmonic lateral loading of varying amplitude and frequency is inspected. The analysis of original field measurements (soil accelerations and pore pressures) enables the lateral stiffness observed at the monopile head to be linked to dynamic effects occurring in the surrounding soil. The interpretation of measured data is supported by three-dimensional finite-element studies, also looking at the influence of drainage conditions and monopile size. The set of results presented supports the need for dynamics-based monopile design, as higher frequencies gain relevance in the most recent offshore wind developments.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)812-825
Number of pages14
JournalGeotechnique: international journal of soil mechanics
Volume71
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020

Bibliographical note

Accepted Author Manuscript

Keywords

  • dynamics
  • finite-element modelling
  • full-scale tests
  • piles & piling
  • sands
  • soil/structure interaction

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Frequency effects in the dynamic lateral stiffness of monopiles in sand: insight from field tests and 3D FE modelling'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this