Standard

Governing crowd-based innovations : an interdisciplinary research agenda. / Cuppen, Eefje; Klievink, Bram; Doorn, Neelke.

In: Journal of Responsible Innovation, Vol. 6, No. 2, 04.05.2019, p. 232-239.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Cuppen, Eefje ; Klievink, Bram ; Doorn, Neelke. / Governing crowd-based innovations : an interdisciplinary research agenda. In: Journal of Responsible Innovation. 2019 ; Vol. 6, No. 2. pp. 232-239.

BibTeX

@article{099bea222ab647989516cb3bcb8b332c,
title = "Governing crowd-based innovations: an interdisciplinary research agenda",
abstract = "The crowd increasingly plays a key role in facilitating innovations in a variety of sectors, spurred on by IT-developments and the concomitant increase in connectivity. Initiatives in this direction, captured under the umbrella-term ‘crowd-based innovations’ (CBI), offer novel opportunities in all domains of society by increasing the access, reach and speed of services and goods. At the same time, they signify important challenges because these innovations occur in a context of traditional, well-established institutional arrangements. CBI create an ‘institutional void’: existing rules, standards and practices are challenged and renegotiated. This raises questions about the safeguarding of public values such as quality, legitimacy, efficiency and governance of crowd-based innovations. The objective of this perspective piece is to present an interdisciplinary research agenda to address normative challenges for governing CBI. We will argue that such an agenda needs an integrated empirical-normative approach. We will detail three lines of empirical-normative research that together build up towards an interdisciplinary agenda.",
keywords = "crowd-based innovations, governance, Institutional void, public values",
author = "Eefje Cuppen and Bram Klievink and Neelke Doorn",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1080/23299460.2019.1586511",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "232--239",
journal = "Journal of Responsible Innovation",
issn = "2329-9460",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Governing crowd-based innovations

T2 - Journal of Responsible Innovation

AU - Cuppen, Eefje

AU - Klievink, Bram

AU - Doorn, Neelke

PY - 2019/5/4

Y1 - 2019/5/4

N2 - The crowd increasingly plays a key role in facilitating innovations in a variety of sectors, spurred on by IT-developments and the concomitant increase in connectivity. Initiatives in this direction, captured under the umbrella-term ‘crowd-based innovations’ (CBI), offer novel opportunities in all domains of society by increasing the access, reach and speed of services and goods. At the same time, they signify important challenges because these innovations occur in a context of traditional, well-established institutional arrangements. CBI create an ‘institutional void’: existing rules, standards and practices are challenged and renegotiated. This raises questions about the safeguarding of public values such as quality, legitimacy, efficiency and governance of crowd-based innovations. The objective of this perspective piece is to present an interdisciplinary research agenda to address normative challenges for governing CBI. We will argue that such an agenda needs an integrated empirical-normative approach. We will detail three lines of empirical-normative research that together build up towards an interdisciplinary agenda.

AB - The crowd increasingly plays a key role in facilitating innovations in a variety of sectors, spurred on by IT-developments and the concomitant increase in connectivity. Initiatives in this direction, captured under the umbrella-term ‘crowd-based innovations’ (CBI), offer novel opportunities in all domains of society by increasing the access, reach and speed of services and goods. At the same time, they signify important challenges because these innovations occur in a context of traditional, well-established institutional arrangements. CBI create an ‘institutional void’: existing rules, standards and practices are challenged and renegotiated. This raises questions about the safeguarding of public values such as quality, legitimacy, efficiency and governance of crowd-based innovations. The objective of this perspective piece is to present an interdisciplinary research agenda to address normative challenges for governing CBI. We will argue that such an agenda needs an integrated empirical-normative approach. We will detail three lines of empirical-normative research that together build up towards an interdisciplinary agenda.

KW - crowd-based innovations

KW - governance

KW - Institutional void

KW - public values

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063910707&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/23299460.2019.1586511

DO - 10.1080/23299460.2019.1586511

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 232

EP - 239

JO - Journal of Responsible Innovation

JF - Journal of Responsible Innovation

SN - 2329-9460

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 53255410