TY - JOUR
T1 - Governing through visions
T2 - Evaluating the performativity of the European gas target models
AU - Dignum, Marloes
AU - Correljé, Aad
AU - Groenleer, Martijn
AU - Scholten, Daniel
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - In 2010 an initiative was launched to realize a competitive single EU market for natural gas through the use of a future vision. This Gas Target Model (GTM) aimed to provide direction for concrete market development through regulatory structures as well as an overarching scope of what a functioning gas market would entail. This paper assesses the use and impact of such sectoral visions. We develop a framework that builds on the sociology of expectations and foresight studies and distinguish between the envisioning process, vision content, and vision use (output). The analysis follows the development of two versions of the GTM: 2011 and 2015. We find that the GTM has a contradictory nature. The vision that feeds into regulatory structures requires a stable and uniform rule set. The overarching vision requires incorporation of long-term uncertainty and adaptability. Moreover, the sectoral focus requires alignment to adjacent sectors and wider policy considerations. This makes it difficult to set boundaries, to identify relevant actors, and to ensure commitment from these actors. We conclude that the former vision was actively pursued and materialized in Framework Guidelines and Network Codes, while the latter vision is just being identified and framed.
AB - In 2010 an initiative was launched to realize a competitive single EU market for natural gas through the use of a future vision. This Gas Target Model (GTM) aimed to provide direction for concrete market development through regulatory structures as well as an overarching scope of what a functioning gas market would entail. This paper assesses the use and impact of such sectoral visions. We develop a framework that builds on the sociology of expectations and foresight studies and distinguish between the envisioning process, vision content, and vision use (output). The analysis follows the development of two versions of the GTM: 2011 and 2015. We find that the GTM has a contradictory nature. The vision that feeds into regulatory structures requires a stable and uniform rule set. The overarching vision requires incorporation of long-term uncertainty and adaptability. Moreover, the sectoral focus requires alignment to adjacent sectors and wider policy considerations. This makes it difficult to set boundaries, to identify relevant actors, and to ensure commitment from these actors. We conclude that the former vision was actively pursued and materialized in Framework Guidelines and Network Codes, while the latter vision is just being identified and framed.
KW - EU gas market
KW - Gas target model
KW - Governance
KW - Technological visions
UR - http://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:86bea449-496f-47c9-99f0-f65ab7725e0d
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85034750314&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.erss.2017.10.016
DO - 10.1016/j.erss.2017.10.016
M3 - Article
SN - 2214-6296
JO - Energy Research and Social Science
JF - Energy Research and Social Science
ER -