Java unit testing tool competition - Fifth round

Annibale Panichella, Urko Rueda Molina

Research output: Chapter in Book/Conference proceedings/Edited volumeConference contributionScientificpeer-review

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

After four successful JUnit tool competitions, we report on the achievements of a new Java Unit Testing Tool Competition. This 5th contest introduces statistical analyses in the benchmark infrastructure and has been validated with significance against the results of the previous 4th edition. Overall, the competition evaluates four automated JUnit testing tools taking as baseline human written test cases from real projects. The paper details the modifications performed to the methodology and provides full results of the competition.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings - 2017 IEEE/ACM 10th International Workshop on Search-Based Software Testing, SBST 2017
PublisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
Pages32-38
Number of pages7
ISBN (Electronic)9781538627891
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Jul 2017
Externally publishedYes
Event10th IEEE/ACM International Workshop on Search-Based Software Testing, SBST 2017 - Buenos Aires, Argentina
Duration: 22 May 201723 May 2017

Conference

Conference10th IEEE/ACM International Workshop on Search-Based Software Testing, SBST 2017
Country/TerritoryArgentina
CityBuenos Aires
Period22/05/1723/05/17

Keywords

  • Automated unit testing
  • Benchmark
  • Java
  • Mutation testing
  • Statistical analysis
  • Tool competition

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Java unit testing tool competition - Fifth round'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
  • EvoSuite at the SBST 2020 Tool Competition

    Panichella, A., Campos, J. & Fraser, G., 2020, Proceedings - 2020 IEEE/ACM 42nd International Conference on Software Engineering Workshops, ICSEW 2020. ACM/IEEE, p. 549-552 4 p.

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Conference proceedings/Edited volumeConference contributionScientificpeer-review

    Open Access
    File
    10 Citations (Scopus)
    2 Downloads (Pure)

Cite this