Standard

Modelling in applied hydraulics : More accurate in decision making than in science? / Mosselman, Erik.

2017. 55-55 Abstract from SymHydro 2017, Nice, France.

Research output: Contribution to conferenceAbstractScientific

Harvard

Mosselman, E 2017, 'Modelling in applied hydraulics: More accurate in decision making than in science?' SymHydro 2017, Nice, France, 14/06/17 - 16/06/17, pp. 55-55.

APA

Vancouver

Author

BibTeX

@conference{38f0e80ed41043fbb7efc501485502a8,
title = "Modelling in applied hydraulics: More accurate in decision making than in science?",
abstract = "Marked differences occur between modelling in scientific hydraulic research, in hydraulic engineering and in public decision making. This study reviews ifferences in the required accuracy of model results and differences in the choice between physical and numerical modelling. Physical models are used for studying elementary processes and their interactions under controlled conditions in scientific research; for the planning and design of interventions in hydraulic engineering; and for explanation and demonstration in public decision making. Numerical models are powerful tools in scientific research, butfield applications cannot be verified or validated according to rigorous scientific standards. Hydraulic engineers use numerical models for various purposes, some requiring a high accuracy and some not. They are used to uncertainty and deal with this by means of sensitivity analyses or probabilistic approaches. Numerical models are also used for decision making on interventions that affect stakeholders, sometimes even having the last word in corresponding protocols or legislation. The suggested or perceived accuracy of model results is in this context much higher than the real accuracy. This leads to the paradoxical situation that decision makers and stakeholders put higher demands on accuracy than scientists do.",
keywords = "Physical modelling, numerical modelling, validation, design flood levels",
author = "Erik Mosselman",
year = "2017",
language = "English",
pages = "55--55",
note = "SymHydro 2017 : Choosing the right model in applied hydraulics ; Conference date: 14-06-2017 Through 16-06-2017",
url = "http://www.simhydro.org/",

}

RIS

TY - CONF

T1 - Modelling in applied hydraulics

T2 - More accurate in decision making than in science?

AU - Mosselman, Erik

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Marked differences occur between modelling in scientific hydraulic research, in hydraulic engineering and in public decision making. This study reviews ifferences in the required accuracy of model results and differences in the choice between physical and numerical modelling. Physical models are used for studying elementary processes and their interactions under controlled conditions in scientific research; for the planning and design of interventions in hydraulic engineering; and for explanation and demonstration in public decision making. Numerical models are powerful tools in scientific research, butfield applications cannot be verified or validated according to rigorous scientific standards. Hydraulic engineers use numerical models for various purposes, some requiring a high accuracy and some not. They are used to uncertainty and deal with this by means of sensitivity analyses or probabilistic approaches. Numerical models are also used for decision making on interventions that affect stakeholders, sometimes even having the last word in corresponding protocols or legislation. The suggested or perceived accuracy of model results is in this context much higher than the real accuracy. This leads to the paradoxical situation that decision makers and stakeholders put higher demands on accuracy than scientists do.

AB - Marked differences occur between modelling in scientific hydraulic research, in hydraulic engineering and in public decision making. This study reviews ifferences in the required accuracy of model results and differences in the choice between physical and numerical modelling. Physical models are used for studying elementary processes and their interactions under controlled conditions in scientific research; for the planning and design of interventions in hydraulic engineering; and for explanation and demonstration in public decision making. Numerical models are powerful tools in scientific research, butfield applications cannot be verified or validated according to rigorous scientific standards. Hydraulic engineers use numerical models for various purposes, some requiring a high accuracy and some not. They are used to uncertainty and deal with this by means of sensitivity analyses or probabilistic approaches. Numerical models are also used for decision making on interventions that affect stakeholders, sometimes even having the last word in corresponding protocols or legislation. The suggested or perceived accuracy of model results is in this context much higher than the real accuracy. This leads to the paradoxical situation that decision makers and stakeholders put higher demands on accuracy than scientists do.

KW - Physical modelling

KW - numerical modelling

KW - validation

KW - design flood levels

UR - http://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:38f0e80e-d410-43fb-b7ef-c501485502a8

M3 - Abstract

SP - 55

EP - 55

ER -

ID: 19689321