Of straw figures and multi-stakeholder monitoring: a response to Willem Schinkel

Fran Meissner

doi:10.1186/s40878-019-0121-y

Of straw figures and multi-stakeholder monitoring: a response to Willem Schinkel

Fran Meissner

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Scientific › peer-review

12 Citations (Scopus)

156 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article is a response to Willem Schinkel’s provocation piece. While mostly agreeing with Schinkel, my response questions Schinkel’s commitment to losing immigrant integration as an object of analysis. I point to the integrationist logic with which Schinkel assaults superdiversity, to more broadly question how prescriptive a social science that is ‘against immigrant integration’ should be.

Original language	English
Article number	18
Number of pages	8
Journal	Comparative Migration Studies
Volume	7
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-019-0121-y
Publication status	Published - 2019

Keywords

Superdiversity
Straw figure argument
Immigrant integration
Disintegration

Access to Document

10.1186/s40878-019-0121-yLicence: CC BY

s40878-019-0121-yFinal published version, 365 KBLicence: CC BY

Cite this

@article{9972a9b2ae7e4ed6b576208893a88907,

title = "Of straw figures and multi-stakeholder monitoring: a response to Willem Schinkel",

abstract = "This article is a response to Willem Schinkel{\textquoteright}s provocation piece. While mostly agreeing with Schinkel, my response questions Schinkel{\textquoteright}s commitment to losing immigrant integration as an object of analysis. I point to the integrationist logic with which Schinkel assaults superdiversity, to more broadly question how prescriptive a social science that is {\textquoteleft}against immigrant integration{\textquoteright} should be.",

keywords = "Superdiversity, Straw figure argument, Immigrant integration, Disintegration",

author = "Fran Meissner",

year = "2019",

doi = "10.1186/s40878-019-0121-y",

language = "English",

volume = "7",

journal = "Comparative Migration Studies",

issn = "2214-594x",

publisher = "Springer",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Of straw figures and multi-stakeholder monitoring

T2 - a response to Willem Schinkel

AU - Meissner, Fran

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - This article is a response to Willem Schinkel’s provocation piece. While mostly agreeing with Schinkel, my response questions Schinkel’s commitment to losing immigrant integration as an object of analysis. I point to the integrationist logic with which Schinkel assaults superdiversity, to more broadly question how prescriptive a social science that is ‘against immigrant integration’ should be.

AB - This article is a response to Willem Schinkel’s provocation piece. While mostly agreeing with Schinkel, my response questions Schinkel’s commitment to losing immigrant integration as an object of analysis. I point to the integrationist logic with which Schinkel assaults superdiversity, to more broadly question how prescriptive a social science that is ‘against immigrant integration’ should be.

KW - Superdiversity

KW - Straw figure argument

KW - Immigrant integration

KW - Disintegration

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065200200&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s40878-019-0121-y

DO - 10.1186/s40878-019-0121-y

M3 - Article

SN - 2214-594x

VL - 7

JO - Comparative Migration Studies

JF - Comparative Migration Studies

IS - 1

M1 - 18

ER -

Of straw figures and multi-stakeholder monitoring: a response to Willem Schinkel

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this