Standard

Organisation and performance of public transport: A systematic cross-case comparison of metropolitan areas in Europe, Australia, and Canada. / Hirschhorn, Fabio; Veeneman, Wijnand; van de Velde, Didier.

In: Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 124, 06.2019, p. 419-432.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

BibTeX

@article{f9e7be814a964244b0f86b348cd93f3a,
title = "Organisation and performance of public transport: A systematic cross-case comparison of metropolitan areas in Europe, Australia, and Canada",
abstract = "The paper investigates how the interplay between six organisational elements of public transport systems (conditions) – i.e. integration of planning responsibilities within an authority at the regional/metropolitan level; land-use and transport integration; long-term metropolitan public transport planning; agency over funding; fare integration, and allocation of risks between gov- ernment and operators - influence two key performance indicators (outcomes) – modal split and cost-recovery. The study focuses on selected metropolitan areas in Europe, Australia, and Canada, and employs Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA). QCA can handle multiple explanatory conditions in combination, framing the relationship between conditions and studied outcomes in terms of necessity and sufficiency. The paper reveals three alternative combinations of organi- sational elements that are sufficient for achieving each outcome, underscoring that modal split and cost-recovery depend on the combined effects of multiple conditions (conjunctural caus- ality), and that different paths can lead to similar results (equifinality). Furthermore, even though both outcomes are linked to higher usage of public transport, findings suggest that each of them might require decision-makers to give attention to different elements. Higher modal split is closely linked to both integration between land-use and transport, and the integration of planning responsibilities within an authority at the regional/metropolitan level. Higher cost-recovery, in turn, requires focus on the way agency over funding and risk allocation strategies shape in- centives for savings and/or revenue generation.",
keywords = "Metropolitan public transport, Public transport governance, Public transport performance, Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA)",
author = "Fabio Hirschhorn and Wijnand Veeneman and {van de Velde}, Didier",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/j.tra.2019.04.008",
language = "English",
volume = "124",
pages = "419--432",
journal = "Transportation Research. Part A: Policy & Practice",
issn = "0965-8564",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Organisation and performance of public transport: A systematic cross-case comparison of metropolitan areas in Europe, Australia, and Canada

AU - Hirschhorn, Fabio

AU - Veeneman, Wijnand

AU - van de Velde, Didier

PY - 2019/6

Y1 - 2019/6

N2 - The paper investigates how the interplay between six organisational elements of public transport systems (conditions) – i.e. integration of planning responsibilities within an authority at the regional/metropolitan level; land-use and transport integration; long-term metropolitan public transport planning; agency over funding; fare integration, and allocation of risks between gov- ernment and operators - influence two key performance indicators (outcomes) – modal split and cost-recovery. The study focuses on selected metropolitan areas in Europe, Australia, and Canada, and employs Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA). QCA can handle multiple explanatory conditions in combination, framing the relationship between conditions and studied outcomes in terms of necessity and sufficiency. The paper reveals three alternative combinations of organi- sational elements that are sufficient for achieving each outcome, underscoring that modal split and cost-recovery depend on the combined effects of multiple conditions (conjunctural caus- ality), and that different paths can lead to similar results (equifinality). Furthermore, even though both outcomes are linked to higher usage of public transport, findings suggest that each of them might require decision-makers to give attention to different elements. Higher modal split is closely linked to both integration between land-use and transport, and the integration of planning responsibilities within an authority at the regional/metropolitan level. Higher cost-recovery, in turn, requires focus on the way agency over funding and risk allocation strategies shape in- centives for savings and/or revenue generation.

AB - The paper investigates how the interplay between six organisational elements of public transport systems (conditions) – i.e. integration of planning responsibilities within an authority at the regional/metropolitan level; land-use and transport integration; long-term metropolitan public transport planning; agency over funding; fare integration, and allocation of risks between gov- ernment and operators - influence two key performance indicators (outcomes) – modal split and cost-recovery. The study focuses on selected metropolitan areas in Europe, Australia, and Canada, and employs Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA). QCA can handle multiple explanatory conditions in combination, framing the relationship between conditions and studied outcomes in terms of necessity and sufficiency. The paper reveals three alternative combinations of organi- sational elements that are sufficient for achieving each outcome, underscoring that modal split and cost-recovery depend on the combined effects of multiple conditions (conjunctural caus- ality), and that different paths can lead to similar results (equifinality). Furthermore, even though both outcomes are linked to higher usage of public transport, findings suggest that each of them might require decision-makers to give attention to different elements. Higher modal split is closely linked to both integration between land-use and transport, and the integration of planning responsibilities within an authority at the regional/metropolitan level. Higher cost-recovery, in turn, requires focus on the way agency over funding and risk allocation strategies shape in- centives for savings and/or revenue generation.

KW - Metropolitan public transport

KW - Public transport governance

KW - Public transport performance

KW - Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA)

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064845387&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.tra.2019.04.008

DO - 10.1016/j.tra.2019.04.008

M3 - Article

VL - 124

SP - 419

EP - 432

JO - Transportation Research. Part A: Policy & Practice

T2 - Transportation Research. Part A: Policy & Practice

JF - Transportation Research. Part A: Policy & Practice

SN - 0965-8564

ER -

ID: 53611476