TY - GEN
T1 - Personalized design process for persuasive technologies
AU - van Dooren, Marierose
AU - Visch, Valentijn
AU - Spijkerman, Renske
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - In this position paper we discuss the application of personalization in persuasive technology design in light of the Personalized Design Process model (PDP-model). The PDP-model defines personalization as aligning a persuasive product to the end-user by stakeholder involvement (i.e. designers, endusers, domain experts and family/relatives) across the Problem Definition-, the Product Design- and/or the Tailoring design phases. It is expected that personalization in a PDP enhances the motivation of end-users to interact longer and more frequently with a product, increasing the likelihood that the product will reach its aimed-for effect. Although personalization in a PDP is a common method in persuasive product design, its added value has not been sufficiently validated by scientific research. We propose several reasons for the frequent use of personalization in a PDP, despite the lack of evidence for its added value. Furthermore, we discuss how personalization could be validated according to the PDP-model.
AB - In this position paper we discuss the application of personalization in persuasive technology design in light of the Personalized Design Process model (PDP-model). The PDP-model defines personalization as aligning a persuasive product to the end-user by stakeholder involvement (i.e. designers, endusers, domain experts and family/relatives) across the Problem Definition-, the Product Design- and/or the Tailoring design phases. It is expected that personalization in a PDP enhances the motivation of end-users to interact longer and more frequently with a product, increasing the likelihood that the product will reach its aimed-for effect. Although personalization in a PDP is a common method in persuasive product design, its added value has not been sufficiently validated by scientific research. We propose several reasons for the frequent use of personalization in a PDP, despite the lack of evidence for its added value. Furthermore, we discuss how personalization could be validated according to the PDP-model.
KW - Design
KW - Personalized
KW - Persuasive technology
KW - Process
KW - Tailoring
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019417634&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:0e0d1515-205b-402a-b8b3-1e3e755e0872
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85019417634
VL - 1833
T3 - CEUR Workshop Proceedings
SP - 26
EP - 31
BT - Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Personalization in Persuasive Technology
A2 - Orji, R.
A2 - Reisinger, M.
A2 - Busch, M.
A2 - Dijkstra, A.
A2 - Kaptein, M.
A2 - Mattheiss, E.
PB - CEUR-WS
T2 - Persuasive Technology XII 2017
Y2 - 3 April 2017 through 6 April 2017
ER -