The value of and myths about enterprise architecture

Yiwei Gong*, Marijn Janssen

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

66 Citations (Scopus)
341 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Enterprise Architecture (EA) has been embraced by many organizations to improve the value of their IT. Our systematic literature review (SLR) reveals that EA is a broad concept that is interpreted and used in many different ways. This breadth can be explained by the various starting points taken, and by the content-dependent nature of many EA efforts. Unsurprisingly, the literature presents diverse views on value creation and locates the value of EA in a broad range of areas. Only half of the articles provide empirical evidence supporting the EA value claims. Frequently, values are assumed to be the result of EA efforts, but many alternative explanations are possible. Based on the SLR findings, we identify EA myths that are attributable to an overly simplistic conceptualization of EA. These myths have their basis in the claim that EA is an instrument that can solve almost any kind of enterprise problem. This fails to acknowledge that EA in itself often does not provide value, but is an instrument enabling the creation of value. Based on our findings, we recommend demystifying EA by analysing the context-dependent mechanisms behind EA that result in value creation and developing rigorous evidence-based approaches to better understand EA.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-9
Number of pages9
JournalInternational Journal of Information Management
Volume46
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Keywords

  • Enterprise architecture
  • Information architecture
  • IT architecture
  • Systematic literature review
  • Value

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The value of and myths about enterprise architecture'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this