Towards the next generation of LMRA instruments: the influence of generic and specific questions during risk assessment

Wouter M.P. Steijn*, Dolf A.van der Beek, Jop Groeneweg, Anne Jansen, Wieke A. Oldenhof, Ingrid Raben

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Last minute risk assessment (LMRA) is a well-known work method to support employees’ risk perception. However, little is known about the effectiveness of LMRA in providing this support. Here, we describe an eye-tracking experiment with which we attempted to gain more insight into the relationship between LMRA and risk perception and to assess the difference between generic and specific supporting questions. Employees from an international energy production and desalination company participated in this experiment by assessing photographs portraying a (staged) work situation and deciding whether it was safe enough to continue activities and which risk factors were present or absent. The results show a consistent interaction effect over several parameters between work experience and the type of supporting questions, indicating that generic and specific supporting questions should be considered complimentary to each other. Furthermore, the results revealed several other challenges concerning real-world application of the LMRA.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1179-1192
Number of pages14
JournalInternational Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics
Volume27
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020

Keywords

  • eye tracking technology
  • last minute risk assessment
  • risk assessment
  • risk perception

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Towards the next generation of LMRA instruments: the influence of generic and specific questions during risk assessment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this