Treewidth of display graphs: Bounds, brambles and applications

Remie Janssen, Mark Jones, Steven Kelk, Georgios Stamoulis, Taoyang Wu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)
66 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Phylogenetic trees and networks are leaf-labelled graphs used to model evolution. Display graphs are created by identifying common leaf labels in two or more phylogenetic trees or networks. The treewidth of such graphs is bounded as a function of many common dissimilarity measures between phylogenetic trees and this has been leveraged in fixed parameter tractability results. Here we further elucidate the properties of display graphs and their interaction with treewidth. We show that it is NP-hard to recognize display graphs, but that display graphs of bounded treewidth can be recognized in linear time. Next we show that if a phylogenetic network displays (i.e. topologically embeds) a phylogenetic tree, the treewidth of their display graph is bounded by a function of the treewidth of the original network (and also by various other parameters). In fact, using a bramble argument we show that this treewidth bound is sharp up to an additive term of 1. We leverage this bound to give an FPT algorithm, parameterized by treewidth, for determining whether a network displays a tree, which is an intensively-studied problem in the field. We conclude with a discussion on the future use of display graphs and treewidth in phylogenetics.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)715-743
Number of pages29
JournalJournal of Graph Algorithms and Applications
Volume23
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Treewidth of display graphs: Bounds, brambles and applications'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this