Standard

Urban experimentation and institutional arrangements. / Raven, Rob; Sengers, Frans; Spaeth, Philipp; Xie, Linjun; Cheshmehzangi, Ali; de Jong, Martin.

In: European Planning Studies, 25.10.2017, p. 1-24.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Harvard

Raven, R, Sengers, F, Spaeth, P, Xie, L, Cheshmehzangi, A & de Jong, M 2017, 'Urban experimentation and institutional arrangements' European Planning Studies, pp. 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2017.1393047

APA

Raven, R., Sengers, F., Spaeth, P., Xie, L., Cheshmehzangi, A., & de Jong, M. (2017). Urban experimentation and institutional arrangements. European Planning Studies, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2017.1393047

Vancouver

Raven R, Sengers F, Spaeth P, Xie L, Cheshmehzangi A, de Jong M. Urban experimentation and institutional arrangements. European Planning Studies. 2017 Oct 25;1-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2017.1393047

Author

Raven, Rob ; Sengers, Frans ; Spaeth, Philipp ; Xie, Linjun ; Cheshmehzangi, Ali ; de Jong, Martin. / Urban experimentation and institutional arrangements. In: European Planning Studies. 2017 ; pp. 1-24.

BibTeX

@article{fcc6773c61804b47ae429c339e268782,
title = "Urban experimentation and institutional arrangements",
abstract = "Currently little is known about how institutional arrangements co-evolve with urban experimentation. This paper mobilizes neo-institutional literature and recent urban experimentation literature as a framework to explore how and why institutional arrangements differ across urban contexts. Empirically the paper focusses on smart city initiatives in Amsterdam, Hamburg and Ningbo. These three cities are frontrunners in adopting a comprehensive smart city agenda, but they do so in different ways. The paper examines regulative, normative and cognitive elements of institutional arrangements, explores how they shape experimentation, and reflects on their place-based specificities. The comparative analysis suggests that the focus of, and approach to, experimentation can be understood as resting in a (possibly unique) combination of strategic agency and dynamics at multiple spatial scales.",
keywords = "comparative case study, institutional arrangements, smart cities, Urban experimentation",
author = "Rob Raven and Frans Sengers and Philipp Spaeth and Linjun Xie and Ali Cheshmehzangi and {de Jong}, Martin",
year = "2017",
month = "10",
day = "25",
doi = "10.1080/09654313.2017.1393047",
language = "English",
pages = "1--24",
journal = "European Planning Studies",
issn = "0965-4313",
publisher = "Routledge - Taylor & Francis Group",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Urban experimentation and institutional arrangements

AU - Raven, Rob

AU - Sengers, Frans

AU - Spaeth, Philipp

AU - Xie, Linjun

AU - Cheshmehzangi, Ali

AU - de Jong, Martin

PY - 2017/10/25

Y1 - 2017/10/25

N2 - Currently little is known about how institutional arrangements co-evolve with urban experimentation. This paper mobilizes neo-institutional literature and recent urban experimentation literature as a framework to explore how and why institutional arrangements differ across urban contexts. Empirically the paper focusses on smart city initiatives in Amsterdam, Hamburg and Ningbo. These three cities are frontrunners in adopting a comprehensive smart city agenda, but they do so in different ways. The paper examines regulative, normative and cognitive elements of institutional arrangements, explores how they shape experimentation, and reflects on their place-based specificities. The comparative analysis suggests that the focus of, and approach to, experimentation can be understood as resting in a (possibly unique) combination of strategic agency and dynamics at multiple spatial scales.

AB - Currently little is known about how institutional arrangements co-evolve with urban experimentation. This paper mobilizes neo-institutional literature and recent urban experimentation literature as a framework to explore how and why institutional arrangements differ across urban contexts. Empirically the paper focusses on smart city initiatives in Amsterdam, Hamburg and Ningbo. These three cities are frontrunners in adopting a comprehensive smart city agenda, but they do so in different ways. The paper examines regulative, normative and cognitive elements of institutional arrangements, explores how they shape experimentation, and reflects on their place-based specificities. The comparative analysis suggests that the focus of, and approach to, experimentation can be understood as resting in a (possibly unique) combination of strategic agency and dynamics at multiple spatial scales.

KW - comparative case study

KW - institutional arrangements

KW - smart cities

KW - Urban experimentation

UR - http://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:fcc6773c-6180-4b47-ae42-9c339e268782

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85032020221&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/09654313.2017.1393047

DO - 10.1080/09654313.2017.1393047

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 24

JO - European Planning Studies

T2 - European Planning Studies

JF - European Planning Studies

SN - 0965-4313

ER -

ID: 31674233